BeautiCraft

 This modpack, BeautiCraft, focuses on making Minecraft more beautiful and sonorous without changing the basic gameplay experience. It is packed with client-side improvements: **👀Visual enhancement:** A large collection of mods and resource packs (incl. Fresh Animations, Physics Mod, Continuity, 3D models) for improved particles, animations, UI and textures for a more appealing look. **🎧Acoustic modifications:** With mods such as AmbientSounds or Reactive Music, the soundscape becomes more diverse and immersive. **🛠Quality-of-Life:** Includes minor adjustments to improve the user experience, such as the display of hunger/satiety values (AppleSkin), information about viewed entity (WTHIT), a zoom function (Zoomify) and a quick quit feature (FastQuit). You can find which mods and resource packs are used in the version tab in the corresponding version. The four shaders listed below are pre-installed in the modpack, and the FPS results reflect performance on my personal system: | Shader Pack | Average FPS | 1% Low FPS | |----------------------------------------|:------------------:|---------------------:| | Complementary Shaders | 47.4 FPS | 36.2 FPS | | BSL Shaders (default) | 65.7 FPS | 45.4 FPS | | MakeUp - Ultra Fast | 122 FPS | 64.7 FPS | | Vanilla | 432 FPS | 144.8 FPS | complete fps test Note: The FPS were slightly lower because the recording program and server were running on the same computer. camera movement was made with [Typewriter](https://modrinth.com/plugin/typewriter) plugin Test system: - GPU: NVIDIA RTX 3060 - CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 5600X - RAM: 16 GB - Resolution: 2560×1440 (1440p) - Minecraft Render Distance: 12 chunks - Modpack version 3.1.0 This was a simple FPS test on my Minecraft server using a smooth camera fly-through to compare the performance of different shaders. It's not a full benchmark (e.g., no mobs, redstone, or heavy gameplay), but it gives a general idea of how well each shader performs in this environment.